Jan 12, 2022

Pre-Retrieval vs. Post-Generation in RAG: What You Need to Know

Robert

Pre-Retrieval vs. Post-Generation in RAG: What You Need to Know



I’ve always been fascinated by how AI models handle complex tasks like summarization, question answering, and data retrieval. One method that stands out is Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Over time, I realized that how the retrieval step is positioned—either pre-retrieval or post-generation—can significantly impact the model's performance and output quality. This is a topic I find intriguing, and I’m excited to share insights into when to use each method and how they differ.

In this article, I’ll break down the differences between pre-retrieval and post-generation in RAG, share my own experience with these approaches, and guide you through when to use each.


What is Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)?


Before diving into the differences between pre-retrieval and post-generation, it’s essential to understand the basics of RAG. RAG combines two fundamental AI techniques—retrieval and generation—to enhance the performance of models in tasks like summarization, answering questions, and generating relevant text based on input.

RAG works by retrieving relevant documents or pieces of information from a large corpus and using that information to generate more accurate responses. Unlike traditional models that rely solely on pre-trained knowledge, RAG allows the model to pull in real-time data or highly specific information from external sources, making the output much more contextual and relevant.

When I first started working with RAG, I was impressed by how much more accurate and detailed the results were compared to models that didn’t use retrieval. The flexibility and adaptability that RAG offers made it a game-changer for a wide range of tasks, from generating research summaries to handling customer service inquiries.


Pre-Retrieval in RAG


Pre-retrieval is the method where the retrieval process occurs before the model begins generating its output. Essentially, the model first searches through a corpus to find the most relevant documents or data based on a query. Once the relevant information is retrieved, the model uses this data as the foundation for generating the final output.


Here’s how pre-retrieval works:

  1. User Query: The user inputs a query or task.

  2. Document Retrieval: The model searches through its knowledge base or corpus to find relevant documents or data points.

  3. Content Generation: Using the retrieved data, the model generates a coherent and accurate response.


In my own work, I’ve found pre-retrieval to be especially effective when you need to ensure that the model’s output is based on highly specific, accurate, and up-to-date information. This method is great when the information required for the task isn’t already embedded in the model’s training but needs to be fetched from an external source, like recent research papers or customer databases.


Benefits of Pre-Retrieval

  • Up-to-date information: Because the model retrieves data in real-time, the output is always relevant and current.

  • Domain-specific knowledge: Pre-retrieval allows the model to focus on very specialized or niche information that might not be part of the general knowledge base.

  • Contextual relevance: By pulling in specific data before generating the output, the model ensures that the final response is closely tied to the input query.


When to Use Pre-Retrieval

  • When the information required is constantly changing or being updated.

  • For tasks that need highly accurate and context-specific responses, such as legal, medical, or financial document generation.

  • When the task requires a model to retrieve knowledge from large external datasets or databases.


Post-Generation in RAG


Post-generation, on the other hand, works by generating content before the retrieval step is triggered. In this case, the model first generates a response based on its pre-trained knowledge and any contextual data it has. Once this output is generated, the model retrieves relevant documents or information to supplement or validate the generated content.


Here’s how post-generation works:

  1. Content Generation: The model first generates an output based on the query using its internal knowledge.

  2. Document Retrieval: After generating the initial output, the model then retrieves relevant documents or data to cross-check or enhance the generated content.

  3. Final Output: The retrieved data is used to either supplement or validate the initial response, ensuring that the model’s output is relevant and accurate.


In my experience, post-generation is highly effective when you need the model to generate a broader or more generalized response and then verify or fine-tune that content with specific data. This method is often used when the model’s general understanding is sufficient to generate an initial answer but still needs additional verification from real-world data.


Benefits of Post-Generation

  • Efficiency: The model can generate a response without needing to retrieve information upfront, which can be faster in situations where the initial response is likely sufficient.

  • Cross-validation: By retrieving information after generation, the model can validate and improve its original output, ensuring higher accuracy.

  • Generalization: Post-generation is ideal when the model needs to generate broader content and then adjust or enhance it based on the retrieval step.


When to Use Post-Generation

  • When the model’s pre-trained knowledge is likely to provide a strong starting point for the task.

  • For scenarios where the initial response is sufficient, but you want to cross-check or supplement the information.

  • When the focus is on generating generalized content that doesn’t necessarily rely on highly specific or niche data.


Pre-Retrieval vs. Post-Generation: Key Differences


Now that we’ve covered the basics of pre-retrieval and post-generation, here’s a comparison of the two approaches:


1. Sequence of Operations

  • Pre-retrieval: Retrieves information before generating content. The generated response is built on retrieved, context-specific data.

  • Post-generation: Generates the content first, then retrieves additional information to refine or validate the response.


2. Accuracy vs. Speed

  • Pre-retrieval is more accurate when dealing with highly specific or domain-heavy tasks since the model pulls in relevant information first.

  • Post-generation is faster in situations where a generalized response can be generated and then fine-tuned afterward.


3. Use Case Specificity

  • Pre-retrieval is better suited for domains that require real-time data, such as customer service interactions, research papers, and specialized industries like healthcare or law.

  • Post-generation is more appropriate for general content creation, where an initial draft is enough, and data retrieval helps validate or enhance it later.


How Fine-Tuning Enhances RAG Performance


One thing I’ve learned over time is that fine-tuning can make both pre-retrieval and post-generation systems even more powerful. Fine-tuning involves taking a pre-trained model and training it further on domain-specific datasets to improve its performance on specialized tasks. When applied to RAG systems, fine-tuning brings out the best of both worlds—enhanced relevance from the retrieval step and optimized output from the generation phase.


Fine-Tuning for Pre-Retrieval


When I fine-tune a model specifically for pre-retrieval tasks, it becomes better at identifying the most relevant documents during the retrieval phase. This is particularly useful in industries where accuracy and domain-specific terminology are critical. By fine-tuning the model on a specific dataset—like legal documents or medical reports—it becomes much more efficient at finding the right data to retrieve, ensuring the final output is contextually accurate and relevant.


Fine-Tuning for Post-Generation


In post-generation workflows, fine-tuning helps the model generate better initial content even before retrieval. This can be crucial when the model needs to create a high-quality draft that’s later supplemented or validated by retrieved data. I’ve found that fine-tuning a model to understand specific business requirements or content types makes the generated response much more relevant right from the start, reducing the amount of post-retrieval adjustments required.


Overall Impact of Fine-Tuning on RAG


In my experience, combining fine-tuning with RAG improves both precision and flexibility. Fine-tuning ensures the model is well-versed in the domain, while retrieval makes the output richer and more relevant by bringing in up-to-date or context-specific information. It’s a win-win situation for industries where both general understanding and niche expertise are required.


Choosing Between Pre-Retrieval and Post-Generation


From my own experience, the choice between pre-retrieval and post-generation comes down to the task at hand. If the task requires highly specific or timely information, pre-retrieval will usually produce better results. On the other hand, if the task can rely on more general knowledge and just needs a final layer of validation, post-generation can save time while still ensuring accuracy.


Here are a few practical examples of when I use each method:

  • Pre-Retrieval: I’ve used pre-retrieval for projects involving legal document generation and medical report summaries, where precision is critical. Retrieving the relevant legal cases or medical data first ensures that the generated content is highly specific and accurate.

  • Post-Generation: I tend to lean on post-generation for tasks like blog writing or content marketing. The model can quickly generate a solid draft, and I use the retrieval step to add in the latest stats, references, or research for validation.


Conclusion: Which Method Should You Use?


The choice between pre-retrieval and post-generation in RAG depends largely on the specificity and timeliness of the task at hand. If accuracy, context, and real-time data are crucial, pre-retrieval is the way to go. However, for general content generation that requires a balance of speed and accuracy, post-generation can offer more flexibility and efficiency.

By incorporating fine-tuning, you can take your RAG systems to the next level, ensuring that both the retrieval and generation components are optimized for your specific business needs. Fine-tuning helps create a model that not only understands the nuances of your domain but also retrieves and generates the most accurate and relevant content possible.


Ready to Optimize Your RAG Model?


Whether you need a solution for pre-retrieval, post-generation, or both, our platform specializes in fine-tuning models to fit your specific business needs. Get in touch for a free consultation!

Jan 12, 2022

Pre-Retrieval vs. Post-Generation in RAG: What You Need to Know

Robert

Pre-Retrieval vs. Post-Generation in RAG: What You Need to Know



I’ve always been fascinated by how AI models handle complex tasks like summarization, question answering, and data retrieval. One method that stands out is Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Over time, I realized that how the retrieval step is positioned—either pre-retrieval or post-generation—can significantly impact the model's performance and output quality. This is a topic I find intriguing, and I’m excited to share insights into when to use each method and how they differ.

In this article, I’ll break down the differences between pre-retrieval and post-generation in RAG, share my own experience with these approaches, and guide you through when to use each.


What is Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)?


Before diving into the differences between pre-retrieval and post-generation, it’s essential to understand the basics of RAG. RAG combines two fundamental AI techniques—retrieval and generation—to enhance the performance of models in tasks like summarization, answering questions, and generating relevant text based on input.

RAG works by retrieving relevant documents or pieces of information from a large corpus and using that information to generate more accurate responses. Unlike traditional models that rely solely on pre-trained knowledge, RAG allows the model to pull in real-time data or highly specific information from external sources, making the output much more contextual and relevant.

When I first started working with RAG, I was impressed by how much more accurate and detailed the results were compared to models that didn’t use retrieval. The flexibility and adaptability that RAG offers made it a game-changer for a wide range of tasks, from generating research summaries to handling customer service inquiries.


Pre-Retrieval in RAG


Pre-retrieval is the method where the retrieval process occurs before the model begins generating its output. Essentially, the model first searches through a corpus to find the most relevant documents or data based on a query. Once the relevant information is retrieved, the model uses this data as the foundation for generating the final output.


Here’s how pre-retrieval works:

  1. User Query: The user inputs a query or task.

  2. Document Retrieval: The model searches through its knowledge base or corpus to find relevant documents or data points.

  3. Content Generation: Using the retrieved data, the model generates a coherent and accurate response.


In my own work, I’ve found pre-retrieval to be especially effective when you need to ensure that the model’s output is based on highly specific, accurate, and up-to-date information. This method is great when the information required for the task isn’t already embedded in the model’s training but needs to be fetched from an external source, like recent research papers or customer databases.


Benefits of Pre-Retrieval

  • Up-to-date information: Because the model retrieves data in real-time, the output is always relevant and current.

  • Domain-specific knowledge: Pre-retrieval allows the model to focus on very specialized or niche information that might not be part of the general knowledge base.

  • Contextual relevance: By pulling in specific data before generating the output, the model ensures that the final response is closely tied to the input query.


When to Use Pre-Retrieval

  • When the information required is constantly changing or being updated.

  • For tasks that need highly accurate and context-specific responses, such as legal, medical, or financial document generation.

  • When the task requires a model to retrieve knowledge from large external datasets or databases.


Post-Generation in RAG


Post-generation, on the other hand, works by generating content before the retrieval step is triggered. In this case, the model first generates a response based on its pre-trained knowledge and any contextual data it has. Once this output is generated, the model retrieves relevant documents or information to supplement or validate the generated content.


Here’s how post-generation works:

  1. Content Generation: The model first generates an output based on the query using its internal knowledge.

  2. Document Retrieval: After generating the initial output, the model then retrieves relevant documents or data to cross-check or enhance the generated content.

  3. Final Output: The retrieved data is used to either supplement or validate the initial response, ensuring that the model’s output is relevant and accurate.


In my experience, post-generation is highly effective when you need the model to generate a broader or more generalized response and then verify or fine-tune that content with specific data. This method is often used when the model’s general understanding is sufficient to generate an initial answer but still needs additional verification from real-world data.


Benefits of Post-Generation

  • Efficiency: The model can generate a response without needing to retrieve information upfront, which can be faster in situations where the initial response is likely sufficient.

  • Cross-validation: By retrieving information after generation, the model can validate and improve its original output, ensuring higher accuracy.

  • Generalization: Post-generation is ideal when the model needs to generate broader content and then adjust or enhance it based on the retrieval step.


When to Use Post-Generation

  • When the model’s pre-trained knowledge is likely to provide a strong starting point for the task.

  • For scenarios where the initial response is sufficient, but you want to cross-check or supplement the information.

  • When the focus is on generating generalized content that doesn’t necessarily rely on highly specific or niche data.


Pre-Retrieval vs. Post-Generation: Key Differences


Now that we’ve covered the basics of pre-retrieval and post-generation, here’s a comparison of the two approaches:


1. Sequence of Operations

  • Pre-retrieval: Retrieves information before generating content. The generated response is built on retrieved, context-specific data.

  • Post-generation: Generates the content first, then retrieves additional information to refine or validate the response.


2. Accuracy vs. Speed

  • Pre-retrieval is more accurate when dealing with highly specific or domain-heavy tasks since the model pulls in relevant information first.

  • Post-generation is faster in situations where a generalized response can be generated and then fine-tuned afterward.


3. Use Case Specificity

  • Pre-retrieval is better suited for domains that require real-time data, such as customer service interactions, research papers, and specialized industries like healthcare or law.

  • Post-generation is more appropriate for general content creation, where an initial draft is enough, and data retrieval helps validate or enhance it later.


How Fine-Tuning Enhances RAG Performance


One thing I’ve learned over time is that fine-tuning can make both pre-retrieval and post-generation systems even more powerful. Fine-tuning involves taking a pre-trained model and training it further on domain-specific datasets to improve its performance on specialized tasks. When applied to RAG systems, fine-tuning brings out the best of both worlds—enhanced relevance from the retrieval step and optimized output from the generation phase.


Fine-Tuning for Pre-Retrieval


When I fine-tune a model specifically for pre-retrieval tasks, it becomes better at identifying the most relevant documents during the retrieval phase. This is particularly useful in industries where accuracy and domain-specific terminology are critical. By fine-tuning the model on a specific dataset—like legal documents or medical reports—it becomes much more efficient at finding the right data to retrieve, ensuring the final output is contextually accurate and relevant.


Fine-Tuning for Post-Generation


In post-generation workflows, fine-tuning helps the model generate better initial content even before retrieval. This can be crucial when the model needs to create a high-quality draft that’s later supplemented or validated by retrieved data. I’ve found that fine-tuning a model to understand specific business requirements or content types makes the generated response much more relevant right from the start, reducing the amount of post-retrieval adjustments required.


Overall Impact of Fine-Tuning on RAG


In my experience, combining fine-tuning with RAG improves both precision and flexibility. Fine-tuning ensures the model is well-versed in the domain, while retrieval makes the output richer and more relevant by bringing in up-to-date or context-specific information. It’s a win-win situation for industries where both general understanding and niche expertise are required.


Choosing Between Pre-Retrieval and Post-Generation


From my own experience, the choice between pre-retrieval and post-generation comes down to the task at hand. If the task requires highly specific or timely information, pre-retrieval will usually produce better results. On the other hand, if the task can rely on more general knowledge and just needs a final layer of validation, post-generation can save time while still ensuring accuracy.


Here are a few practical examples of when I use each method:

  • Pre-Retrieval: I’ve used pre-retrieval for projects involving legal document generation and medical report summaries, where precision is critical. Retrieving the relevant legal cases or medical data first ensures that the generated content is highly specific and accurate.

  • Post-Generation: I tend to lean on post-generation for tasks like blog writing or content marketing. The model can quickly generate a solid draft, and I use the retrieval step to add in the latest stats, references, or research for validation.


Conclusion: Which Method Should You Use?


The choice between pre-retrieval and post-generation in RAG depends largely on the specificity and timeliness of the task at hand. If accuracy, context, and real-time data are crucial, pre-retrieval is the way to go. However, for general content generation that requires a balance of speed and accuracy, post-generation can offer more flexibility and efficiency.

By incorporating fine-tuning, you can take your RAG systems to the next level, ensuring that both the retrieval and generation components are optimized for your specific business needs. Fine-tuning helps create a model that not only understands the nuances of your domain but also retrieves and generates the most accurate and relevant content possible.


Ready to Optimize Your RAG Model?


Whether you need a solution for pre-retrieval, post-generation, or both, our platform specializes in fine-tuning models to fit your specific business needs. Get in touch for a free consultation!

Jan 12, 2022

Pre-Retrieval vs. Post-Generation in RAG: What You Need to Know

Robert

Pre-Retrieval vs. Post-Generation in RAG: What You Need to Know



I’ve always been fascinated by how AI models handle complex tasks like summarization, question answering, and data retrieval. One method that stands out is Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Over time, I realized that how the retrieval step is positioned—either pre-retrieval or post-generation—can significantly impact the model's performance and output quality. This is a topic I find intriguing, and I’m excited to share insights into when to use each method and how they differ.

In this article, I’ll break down the differences between pre-retrieval and post-generation in RAG, share my own experience with these approaches, and guide you through when to use each.


What is Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)?


Before diving into the differences between pre-retrieval and post-generation, it’s essential to understand the basics of RAG. RAG combines two fundamental AI techniques—retrieval and generation—to enhance the performance of models in tasks like summarization, answering questions, and generating relevant text based on input.

RAG works by retrieving relevant documents or pieces of information from a large corpus and using that information to generate more accurate responses. Unlike traditional models that rely solely on pre-trained knowledge, RAG allows the model to pull in real-time data or highly specific information from external sources, making the output much more contextual and relevant.

When I first started working with RAG, I was impressed by how much more accurate and detailed the results were compared to models that didn’t use retrieval. The flexibility and adaptability that RAG offers made it a game-changer for a wide range of tasks, from generating research summaries to handling customer service inquiries.


Pre-Retrieval in RAG


Pre-retrieval is the method where the retrieval process occurs before the model begins generating its output. Essentially, the model first searches through a corpus to find the most relevant documents or data based on a query. Once the relevant information is retrieved, the model uses this data as the foundation for generating the final output.


Here’s how pre-retrieval works:

  1. User Query: The user inputs a query or task.

  2. Document Retrieval: The model searches through its knowledge base or corpus to find relevant documents or data points.

  3. Content Generation: Using the retrieved data, the model generates a coherent and accurate response.


In my own work, I’ve found pre-retrieval to be especially effective when you need to ensure that the model’s output is based on highly specific, accurate, and up-to-date information. This method is great when the information required for the task isn’t already embedded in the model’s training but needs to be fetched from an external source, like recent research papers or customer databases.


Benefits of Pre-Retrieval

  • Up-to-date information: Because the model retrieves data in real-time, the output is always relevant and current.

  • Domain-specific knowledge: Pre-retrieval allows the model to focus on very specialized or niche information that might not be part of the general knowledge base.

  • Contextual relevance: By pulling in specific data before generating the output, the model ensures that the final response is closely tied to the input query.


When to Use Pre-Retrieval

  • When the information required is constantly changing or being updated.

  • For tasks that need highly accurate and context-specific responses, such as legal, medical, or financial document generation.

  • When the task requires a model to retrieve knowledge from large external datasets or databases.


Post-Generation in RAG


Post-generation, on the other hand, works by generating content before the retrieval step is triggered. In this case, the model first generates a response based on its pre-trained knowledge and any contextual data it has. Once this output is generated, the model retrieves relevant documents or information to supplement or validate the generated content.


Here’s how post-generation works:

  1. Content Generation: The model first generates an output based on the query using its internal knowledge.

  2. Document Retrieval: After generating the initial output, the model then retrieves relevant documents or data to cross-check or enhance the generated content.

  3. Final Output: The retrieved data is used to either supplement or validate the initial response, ensuring that the model’s output is relevant and accurate.


In my experience, post-generation is highly effective when you need the model to generate a broader or more generalized response and then verify or fine-tune that content with specific data. This method is often used when the model’s general understanding is sufficient to generate an initial answer but still needs additional verification from real-world data.


Benefits of Post-Generation

  • Efficiency: The model can generate a response without needing to retrieve information upfront, which can be faster in situations where the initial response is likely sufficient.

  • Cross-validation: By retrieving information after generation, the model can validate and improve its original output, ensuring higher accuracy.

  • Generalization: Post-generation is ideal when the model needs to generate broader content and then adjust or enhance it based on the retrieval step.


When to Use Post-Generation

  • When the model’s pre-trained knowledge is likely to provide a strong starting point for the task.

  • For scenarios where the initial response is sufficient, but you want to cross-check or supplement the information.

  • When the focus is on generating generalized content that doesn’t necessarily rely on highly specific or niche data.


Pre-Retrieval vs. Post-Generation: Key Differences


Now that we’ve covered the basics of pre-retrieval and post-generation, here’s a comparison of the two approaches:


1. Sequence of Operations

  • Pre-retrieval: Retrieves information before generating content. The generated response is built on retrieved, context-specific data.

  • Post-generation: Generates the content first, then retrieves additional information to refine or validate the response.


2. Accuracy vs. Speed

  • Pre-retrieval is more accurate when dealing with highly specific or domain-heavy tasks since the model pulls in relevant information first.

  • Post-generation is faster in situations where a generalized response can be generated and then fine-tuned afterward.


3. Use Case Specificity

  • Pre-retrieval is better suited for domains that require real-time data, such as customer service interactions, research papers, and specialized industries like healthcare or law.

  • Post-generation is more appropriate for general content creation, where an initial draft is enough, and data retrieval helps validate or enhance it later.


How Fine-Tuning Enhances RAG Performance


One thing I’ve learned over time is that fine-tuning can make both pre-retrieval and post-generation systems even more powerful. Fine-tuning involves taking a pre-trained model and training it further on domain-specific datasets to improve its performance on specialized tasks. When applied to RAG systems, fine-tuning brings out the best of both worlds—enhanced relevance from the retrieval step and optimized output from the generation phase.


Fine-Tuning for Pre-Retrieval


When I fine-tune a model specifically for pre-retrieval tasks, it becomes better at identifying the most relevant documents during the retrieval phase. This is particularly useful in industries where accuracy and domain-specific terminology are critical. By fine-tuning the model on a specific dataset—like legal documents or medical reports—it becomes much more efficient at finding the right data to retrieve, ensuring the final output is contextually accurate and relevant.


Fine-Tuning for Post-Generation


In post-generation workflows, fine-tuning helps the model generate better initial content even before retrieval. This can be crucial when the model needs to create a high-quality draft that’s later supplemented or validated by retrieved data. I’ve found that fine-tuning a model to understand specific business requirements or content types makes the generated response much more relevant right from the start, reducing the amount of post-retrieval adjustments required.


Overall Impact of Fine-Tuning on RAG


In my experience, combining fine-tuning with RAG improves both precision and flexibility. Fine-tuning ensures the model is well-versed in the domain, while retrieval makes the output richer and more relevant by bringing in up-to-date or context-specific information. It’s a win-win situation for industries where both general understanding and niche expertise are required.


Choosing Between Pre-Retrieval and Post-Generation


From my own experience, the choice between pre-retrieval and post-generation comes down to the task at hand. If the task requires highly specific or timely information, pre-retrieval will usually produce better results. On the other hand, if the task can rely on more general knowledge and just needs a final layer of validation, post-generation can save time while still ensuring accuracy.


Here are a few practical examples of when I use each method:

  • Pre-Retrieval: I’ve used pre-retrieval for projects involving legal document generation and medical report summaries, where precision is critical. Retrieving the relevant legal cases or medical data first ensures that the generated content is highly specific and accurate.

  • Post-Generation: I tend to lean on post-generation for tasks like blog writing or content marketing. The model can quickly generate a solid draft, and I use the retrieval step to add in the latest stats, references, or research for validation.


Conclusion: Which Method Should You Use?


The choice between pre-retrieval and post-generation in RAG depends largely on the specificity and timeliness of the task at hand. If accuracy, context, and real-time data are crucial, pre-retrieval is the way to go. However, for general content generation that requires a balance of speed and accuracy, post-generation can offer more flexibility and efficiency.

By incorporating fine-tuning, you can take your RAG systems to the next level, ensuring that both the retrieval and generation components are optimized for your specific business needs. Fine-tuning helps create a model that not only understands the nuances of your domain but also retrieves and generates the most accurate and relevant content possible.


Ready to Optimize Your RAG Model?


Whether you need a solution for pre-retrieval, post-generation, or both, our platform specializes in fine-tuning models to fit your specific business needs. Get in touch for a free consultation!

Get Started Now

Use Fine-Tuning To Improve your AI Models

Connect real-life data to continuously improve the performance of your model

With Moyai, you create differentiated AI models that set you apart from the competition

Resources

Moyai ― All rights reserved.

Get Started Now

Use Fine-Tuning To Improve your AI Models

Connect real-life data to continuously improve the performance of your model

With Moyai, you create differentiated AI models that set you apart from the competition

Resources

Moyai ― All rights reserved.

Get Started Now

Use Fine-Tuning To Improve your AI Models

Connect real-life data to continuously improve the performance of your model

With Moyai, you create differentiated AI models that set you apart from the competition

Resources

Moyai ― All rights reserved.